|
|
June 26, 2009
Stan combines all court cases in his copyright,
total of 26 years of damages. Stanley Siler
shows how and the proof that some wisdom
goes a long way in the ability to apply knowledge,
experience, understanding and common sense
In the United States Court of
Federal Claims;
STANLEY R. SILER V. THE UNITED
STATES, case:
09-167C.
Stanley Siler moves for SUMMARY
JUDGMENT.
Dillingham Ship Repair, et al.
"Tort Action"
During Stan's recovery, he had a new and
extremely hard task to over come. Totally
"shocked," how he was treated by
Dillingham Ship Repair, et el. His ex-employer
Dillingham Ship Repair treated him like "dirt.
" Dillingham Ship Repair treated Stan
as if his injury never happened on the job,
taken from the job, but never to involve
Dillingham Ship Repair, acting like, "Stan
your injury never involved Dillingham Ship
Repair."
Now, here is a very simple question directed
at Dillingham Ship Repair and their attorneys?
Why did Dillingham Ship Repair file, "EMPLOYER'S
FIRST REPORT OF INJURY or OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS?"
Here is an argument put forth by Dennis Vavrosky,
Dillingham Ship Repair's attorney, not using
common sense!
"PROVE CASUAL RELATIONSHIP?" Answer:
That's a NO BRAINIER!
After Stan files for Summary Judgment, Stan
receives  Order from the United States Court of Federal
Claims, Case: 09-167C.
|
|
