It takes one to fight for justice. One NOT to back down, have the courage and determination to stand against the odds . . . The defendants issued a challenge against Stans claims and Stanley R. Siler accepted the challenge.

Fighting for rights on the Internet

Mobilizing public opinion is a powerful tool when fighting for causes you are serious about. It is not always easy to make your voice heard and gain the attention of the community, statewide interest and wider targets. In regards to national and international agendas, public trusts and confidence in our legal system are put to the test. The Internet is a medium with global reach where you can present your cause and create awareness of the type of legal actions you are involved in (e.g., punitive damages, personal injury, copyright damages and statutory damages).

Stanley R. Siler (Pro se)

Stan files more than 40 civil suits (pro se), with NO legal help. Stan filed civil suits in the following court cases below. "The Amazing List" All attorneys filed Motion to Dismiss, which is NO defense, to protect their clients, besides the defendants don't have any evidence to support their claims and were afraid to take on Stan. How did Stan do it? Stan . . . says, Piece of Cake. Its times like this you have to laugh, I just obeyed the law and attorneys disobeyed notices.

1. STANLEY R. SILER, claimant, V. DIlLINGHAM SHIP REPAIR/Dil TRUST, a self insured employer, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, [Party in Interest]. Case No. 89-LHC-01411. OWCP NO.14-74891. Honorable Vivian Schreter-Murray, Administrative law Judge.

2. Benefit Review Board: 89-3965, 90-694.

3. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: 90-35320, 90-70154.

4. In The United States District Court of Oregon - STANLEY R. SILER, V. DIlLINGHAM SHIP REPAIR, et al. Case: CV 90-251-PA. Honorable: George E Juba, de novo - Honorable: Chief Judge Owen M. Panner.

5. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: 90-35320, 90-70154; 9070545,94-35306,95-35773; 97-35347.

6. Case: STANLEY R. SILER, Pro se, V. DENNIS VAVROSKY, et al.
Case: CV 01-1734.BR.

7. Case: STANLEY R. SILER, Pro se, V. DENNIS VAVROSKY, et al.
Case: CV 01-1734.BR.

8. In The District Court of State of Oregon for Multnomah County - DEL Delveopement Co/Stan Siler. Case: 92F69308.

9. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; SILER v VAVROSKY, 02-1389.

10. ln The United States District Court of Oregon: Civ. 93-580-JO.

11.United States Court of Federal Claims: 94-359C. Honorable James F. Merow.

12. In The United States District Court of Oregon Civ 94-609-AS.

13. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 95-5020.

14. In The United States District Court of Oregon: CV'97-1557.JE. Honorable John Jelderks.

15. In The United States District Court of Oregon: CV 99-363-HA. Honorable Ancer L. Haggerty.

16.United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; STANLEY R. SILER, V. UNITED STATES: Case: 98-5148 Judgement. Case No.: 99-1567.

17. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY OREGON; Case No.: 99C11 061.

18. SUPREME COURT OF OREGON; STANLEY R. SILER, V. DILLINGHAM SHIP REPAIR, et al. Case: 99-7302-CSX; SC S46904.

19. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY OREGON; Case No.: 00C-18442. Honorable Judge: Joseph Ochoa.

20. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY OREGON; City of Salem, An Oregon Municipal Corporation V. James L. Siler; E. Violet Siler; Oregon Department of Revenue and StanTheMan, Inc., an Oregon Corporation. Case No. Court No.: 01C-11744; Honorable Judge Pamela Abernethy.

21. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF OREGON Case: CA A115299.

22. THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF OREGON CAA114077.

23. SUPREME COURT OF OREGON; STANLEY R. SILER, V. DILLINGHAM SHIP REPAIR, et al. Case: 99-7302-CSX; SC S46904.

24. Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 02-8966.

25. Stanley R. Siler vs. Dennis Vavrosky, et al., Case No. 03C19406.

26. Stanley R. Siler vs. Dennis Vavrosky, et al., Case No. 04C17350.

27. Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 05-11370.

28. Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 05A975.

29. Stanley R. Siler vs. Sedgwick of Oregon, Inc., Case No. 06C11082.

30. Stanley R. Siler vs. Barry Groce, et al., Case No. 06C11083.

31. Stanley R. Siler vs. Emery and Son's Construction, Inc., Case No. 06C1039.

32. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT; Small Claims Division, Case No. 07C13360.

33. Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 07-6460.

34. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: 07-35413.